Trump changes the negotiation model with Russia and Iran: the military comes to the forefront

The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is restructuring the architecture of foreign policy and betting on figures in uniform rather than the classic diplomatic corps. The new configuration has already manifested in contacts with Russia, Iran, and in channels related to the war in Ukraine.

The change in approach is reported by Associated Press.

Washington’s Signal: Negotiations Led by Generals

The White House has for the first time tasked active military leaders with participating in sensitive negotiation formats. This is not an auxiliary role or backstage consultations.

The military is gaining direct access to the formation of political decisions.

Who Exactly is Included in the Process

The Commander of U.S. Central Command Brad Cooper participated in indirect negotiations with Iran, which took place in Oman. His appearance in full dress uniform is interpreted by sources as a demonstration of readiness for a forceful option and a reminder of the U.S. military capabilities.

Simultaneously, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll has become an important participant in the communication line related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. He maintains constant contact with Ukrainian representatives between rounds of discussions.

Ukrainian Direction

According to the agency, Driscoll coordinates actions with Trump’s inner circle, including Jared Kushner and special envoy Steve Witkoff. This allows for the continuity of dialogue even in the absence of noticeable public results.

In fact, a parallel diplomacy is being formed — less public, more operational, with direct lines of communication.

Military Channels in Europe

Alexus Grynkewich, who commands American and NATO forces in Europe, also participated in the negotiations in Abu Dhabi. According to sources, his involvement is intended to maintain working contacts with Moscow and minimize the risks of unintended escalation.

This is a format of “talking through the military,” which in crisis periods sometimes proves more effective than official statements.

Abandoning Classic Diplomacy?

Experts see a conscious departure from the traditional model, where career diplomats play the main role. Former State Department adviser Eliot Cohen reminds us that presidents often use trusted individuals to convey critical signals, especially when the cost of error is high.

The difference is that now these trusted individuals are becoming generals.

In an editorial analysis, NAnews — Israel News | Nikk.Agency emphasizes: for Israel, such logic is understandable. The region has long lived in a reality where diplomacy almost always relies on the factor of force and the ability to quickly transition from words to actions.

What This Means for Moscow and the Region

The increased role of the military may indicate a tougher and more pragmatic line from Washington. In this model, negotiations proceed in parallel with a demonstration of capabilities, rather than instead of it.

This approach changes the expectations of the parties. It reduces the space for symbolic steps and increases the importance of concrete agreements.

Whether such a strategy will be effective depends on whether the participants are ready to hear the signals, which are now transmitted not only through diplomats but also through ranks.